ABSTRACT
Abstract Objective The purpose of the present study is to compare the radiological results of angular correction and its maintenance in the medium term between two minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of hallux valgus (minimally invasive chevron surgery vs. Bosch technique). Methods A comparative prospective analysis of patients undergoing surgery for symptomatic hallux valgus deformity was performed. We compared two minimally invasive techniques in homogeneous groups of population. Two groups of 62 and 63 feet respectively, were constituted. We compared first ray angular corrections and consolidation as well as the correction power of both osteotomies and their maintenance over time. The postoperative complications and surgical time in both study groups were also evaluated. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Results There were differences between both groups in the intermetatarsal angle at 24 months postsurgery. There were no differences between both groups regarding metatarsophalangeal angle, and distal metatarsal articular angle. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. The surgical time between both groups had statistically significant differences. Conclusions Both screw-stabilized, Bosch surgery and minimally invasive chevron (hybrid when associated with percutaneous Akin osteotomy) present adequate correction of moderate hallux valgus. However, patients treated with Bosch percutaneous surgery had a greater correction power of the intermetatarsal angle in the medium term, as well as a shorter surgical time, when compared with those who were treated with chevron osteotomy. Both techniques had a similar evolution over time regarding loss of correction and postoperative complications.
Resumo Objetivo O objetivo deste estudo é comparar os resultados radiológicos da correção angular e sua manutenção no médio prazo entre duas técnicas minimamente invasivas para o tratamento de hálux valgo (cirurgia minimamente invasiva em chevron vs. técnica de Bosch). Métodos Foi realizada uma análise prospectiva comparativa de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia para deformidade sintomática de hálux valgo. Comparamos duas técnicas minimamente invasivas em grupos homogêneos de população. Dois grupos de 62 e 63 pés, respectivamente, foram constituídos. Comparamos correções angulares de primeiro raio e consolidação, bem como o poder de correção tanto das osteotomias quanto de sua manutenção ao longo do tempo. As complicações pós-operatórias e o tempo cirúrgico em ambos os grupos de estudo também foram avaliados. O seguimento mínimo foi de 2 anos. Resultados Houve diferenças entre ambos os grupos no ângulo intermetatarsal aos 24 meses após a cirurgia. Não houve diferenças entre ambos os grupos em relação ao ângulo metatarsofalângico e ao ângulo articular metatarso-distal. Não houve complicações intraoperatórias em nenhum dos grupos. O tempo cirúrgico entre ambos os grupos apresentou diferenças estatisticamente significativas. Conclusões Sendo as duas técnicas estabilizadas por parafusos, tanto a osteotomia de Bosch quanto a cirurgia minimamente invasiva em chevron (híbrida quando associada à osteotomia percutânea de Akin) apresentam correção adequada de hálux valgo moderado. No entanto, os pacientes tratados com a osteotomia percutânea Bosch apresentaram maior poder de correção do ângulo intermetatarsal no médio prazo, bem como e menor tempo cirúrgico, em relação aos que foram tratados com osteotomia em chevron. Ambas as técnicas apresentaram evolução semelhante ao longo do tempo no que se refere à perda de correção e complicações pós-operatórias.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Bone Plates , Clavicle/surgery , Clavicle/diagnostic imaging , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Fracture Fixation, InternalABSTRACT
Introducción: Existen múltiples tratamientos quirúrgicos del hallux valgus. El propósito de este estudio fue comparar los resultados radiográficos de corrección angular y su mantenimiento a mediano plazo, entre dos técnicas percutáneas: MICA y Bösch. Materiales y Métodos: Análisis prospectivo comparativo de pacientes sometidos a cirugía de hallux valgus mediante dos técnicas percutáneas (grupo Bösch: 42 pies, grupo MICA: 36 pies). Se compararon las correcciones de los ángulos IM, MTF y AMD, y el poder de corrección de ambas osteotomías y su mantenimiento a mediano plazo. Se registraron las complicaciones posoperatorias. Seguimiento mínimo: 6 meses. Resultados: La corrección promedio de los ángulos IM, MTF y AMD fue: 20,22°; 7,74°; 8,26° a los 6 meses en el grupo Bösch; y de 15,8°; 1,6° y 1,98° en el grupo MICA. El potencial de corrección IM fue mayor en el grupo Bösch. No hubo diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos en cuanto a la pérdida de corrección entre las 6 semanas y los 6 meses, salvo el ángulo MTF en el grupo MICA. La corrección del ángulo AMD fue mejor en el tiempo con la técnica MICA. Hubo 4 complicaciones con la técnica MICA y 8 con la técnica de Bösch. Conclusiones: Ambas técnicas logran una corrección adecuada del hallux valgus moderado. Sin embargo, el poder de corrección del ángulo IM a mediano plazo fue mayor con la técnica de Bösch. En el otro grupo, aunque se perdió la corrección del ángulo MTF entre las 6 semanas y los 6 meses, los valores se mantuvieron dentro de los 20° de valgo MTF. Nivel de Evidencia: II
Introduction: Multiple surgical treatments for the hallux valgus have been described. The purpose of this study is to compare the radiological results for the angular correction and its stability on the middle term between two percutaneous techniques (MICA versus BOSCH technique). Materials and methods: Prospective comparative analysis of surgically treated patients with hallux valgus by two percutaneous techniques (BOSCH group: 42 feet; MICA group: 36 feet) in homogenous groups. Intermetatarsal, metatarsophalangeal and distal metatarsal articular angle corrections were compared, as well as the correction power of both osteotomies and its stability in the middle term. Postoperative complications were recorded. Minimum follow-up: 6 months. Results: Average angle correction of MTP, IM y DMAA 6 months after surgery in Bosch group: 20,22°; 7,74°; 8,26°; MICA: 15,8°; 1,6° and 1,98° respectively. BOSCH group had a higher IM correction power. There were no significant statistical differences between both groups in the loss of correction by 6 weeks to 6 months; except for the MTP angle in the MICA group. MICA presented a better correction of the DMAA in time. Postoperatively, MICA had 4 complications, while BOSCH 8. Conclusions: We obtained good results with both techniques in the treatment of moderate hallux valgus. However, patients undergoing the Bosch technique had greater correction on the intermetatarsal angle in the mid-term follow-up. Although the MTP angle correction decreased between 6 weeksand 6 months in MICA technique, the values remained within normal 20° of valgus MTP. Level of Evidence: II
Subject(s)
Osteotomy , Hallux Valgus , Treatment Outcome , Minimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresABSTRACT
Introducción: Las fracturas distales de tibia son un desafío terapéutico debido a la escasa cobertura y la particular vascularización. Los objetivos de este estudio son analizar los resultados clínicos y funcionales de los pacientes con fractura de tibia distal, tratados con técnica MIPO con placas bloqueadas; comparar los resultados del grupo de fracturas AO 43A con el de fracturas AO 43C1-C2; y comparar los resultados de la técnica MIPO con el tratamiento abierto convencional. Materiales y Métodos: Entre 2004 y 2012, se evaluaron 32 fracturas de tibia distal tratadas con la técnica MIPO. El 59,4% tenía fracturas AO 43A y el 40,6%, AO 43C. Seguimiento promedio: 39.6 meses, mediante la escala de la AOFAS y radiología. Se consignaron las complicaciones. Se compararon los resultados de los grupos AO A y AO C. Resultados: El grupo AO A: media de 95,89 puntos en la escala AOFAS, en el posoperatorio. El grupo AO C1-2: media de 92,15 puntos en el posoperatorio. Carga del peso corporal: a las 8.7 semanas promedio. Comparación entre AO 43A y AO 43C: p = 0,46 (no significativa). Retorno a la actividad previa a la lesión: 9.3 meses promedio. Comparación entre tipo A y tipo C: p = 0,16 (no significativa). Se detectaron complicaciones en el 18,75% y se retiró la osteosíntesis en 14 casos. Conclusiones: La osteosíntesis mínimamente invasiva con placa y tornillos es una buena opción para las fracturas de tibia distal; con buena evolución clínico-funcional y escasas complicaciones cuando se la compara con la cirugía abierta. Las fracturas 43A presentan menos complicaciones mayores que las 43C, tratadas con la técnica MIPO. Nivel de evidencia: IV.
Introduction: Distal tibial fractures are a therapeutic challenge due to the limited coverage and specific vascularization. The aims of this study are to analyze the clinical outcome and functional results in patients with tibial fracture treated with MIPO technique with locked plates, and to compare AO 43A and AO 43C1-C2 fracture results, and conventional open treatment with MIPO technique. Methods: Between 2004 and 2012, 32 distal tibial fractures treated with MIPO technique were evaluated. The 59.4% were AO 43A fractures and 40.6% were AO 43C. Mean follow-up: 39.6 months using AOFAS Score and X-rays. Complications were recorded. Results in AO A and AO C groups were compared. Results: Mean postoperative AOFAS score was 95.89 and 92.15 in AO A fracture and AO C1-2 fractures respectively. The mean time of weight bearing was 8.7 weeks. The mean time to return to activities was 9.3 months. Complications were detected in the 18.75% and removal of the hardware was necessary in 14 cases. Conclusions: Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis is a good choice for tibial distal fractures, clinical and functional outcomes are good, and there are fewer complications in comparison to open surgery. AO 43A fractures have less complications than AO 43C with this technique. Level of evidence: IV.